Miranda v. arizona what was it about

Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in The Supreme Court, in a decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren , ruled that the prosecution could not introduce Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal trial because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The police duty to give these warnings is compelled by the Constitution's Fifth Amendment , which gives a criminal suspect the right to refuse "to be a witness against himself," and Sixth Amendment, which guarantees criminal defendants the right to an attorney.

The Court maintained that the defendant's right against self-incrimination has long been part of Anglo-American law as a means to equalize the vulnerability inherent in being detained. Such a position, unchecked, can often lead to government abuse. For example, the Court cited the continued high incidence of police violence designed to compel confessions from a suspect.

This and other forms of intimidation, maintained the Court, deprive criminal suspects of their basic liberties and can lead to false confessions. The defendant's right to an attorney is an equally fundamental right, because the presence of an attorney in interrogations, according to Chief Justice Warren, enables "the defendant under otherwise compelling circumstances to tell his story without fear, effectively, and in a way that eliminates the evils in the interrogations process.

This section is for teachers. Use the links below to access: student versions of the activities in. PDF and Word formats how to differentiate and adapt the materials how to scaffold the activities how to extend the activities technology suggestions answers to select activities Learn more about Street Law's commitment and approach to quality curriculum. Available at a high school and middle school levels.

Case Background : Background information at three reading levels. Case Vocabulary : Important related vocabulary terms at two reading levels. Glossary Planning Time and Activities If you have one day. Complete the Classifying Arguments Activity. Discuss which arguments the students find most convincing. Read Miranda v. Follow-up the next day by reviewing the questions with students. If you have two days.

Amendments to Approved Rules. Unofficial Archive of Opinions. Websites Cited in Opinions. Analysis of Caseload. Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee. Oral Argument Broadcasts. Tentative Argument Schedule. Observing Oral Arguments. Visitor Guide to Oral Arguments. Videos of Oral Argument Broadcasts.

Clerk's Office. General Filing Information. About E-Filing Portal. Accessible Court Filings. Court Forms. Administrative Orders. Rules of Appellate Procedure. How the Court Operates. Court Schedule. Representing Yourself? Jury Instructions. Bar Referee Manual. UPL Referee Manual. Florida Bar Exam. Certified Legal Intern Program. Senior Judge Information. Docket Search. Recent Filings. Case Disposition Orders.

Review Granted Orders. Rules Cases: Approved Amendments. Rules Cases: Proposed Amendments. In the decision of United States v. Upcoming Events Explore our upcoming webinars, events and programs. View All Events. Invest In Our Future The most effective way to secure a freer America with more opportunity for all is through engaging, educating, and empowering our youth.

Support now Make your investment into the leaders of tomorrow through the Bill of Rights Institute today!