Which screen is best for mobile

Xiaomi's Redmi Note 11 Pro is an Android smartphone that features a 6. Xiaomi's 11T smartphone features a 6. The Xiaomi 11T Pro offers a similar display, and some improved internal specifications. The iPhone 13 mini offer similar specifications, with a 5. Skip to main content. OLEDs - the best smartphone displays? Read more Posted: Oct 20, Read more Posted: Sep 15, Read more Posted: Jan 14, AMOLED screens have all the attributes of an OLED display like excellent colour reproduction, faster response times, wider viewing angles, higher brightness and extremely light weight designs.

This is the preferred technology of smartphone manufacturers although they are quite expensive to produce. It is a name given by Apple to the high-resolution screen technology introduced on the iPhone 4 in June Something is a Retina Display when it offers a density of pixels above pixels per inch. The company calls it the Retina display because its pixels cannot be individually identified by a human eye, thus rendering a super sharp display, more crisp text and more clear pictures.

Retina Display is designed to smooth the jagged edges of pixels are provide a higher-quality image than previously available on mobile devices. Apple claims that its resolution is so good that it makes it impossible for the human eye to distinguish individual pixels. Its effects shows up in text, images and videos. Color boost is simply Moto's marketing term for their new display. It's somewhere in the middle ground.

Latest Business News. Mumbai cops launch inquiry against Sameer Wankhede, other officials over alleged extortion claims. Horoscope October Stalled work of Libra people will be completed, know about other zodiac signs. Vicky Kaushal-Katrina Kaif to tie the knot by December? Govt invites applications for chief economic adviser post. Apple rolls out iOS Opinion Refusing bail to Aryan Khan is unjustified. Haqikat Kya Hai: Shami bowls Pakistani handlers troll. Kurukshetra: Kranti Redkar replies to allegations put on Sameer Wankhede.

Tamil Nadu: 5 killed in blast at firecracker shop in Sankarapuram. Samsung chief Lee Jae-yong convicted, fined for illegal anesthetic medication use. The higher the value, the more frames per second are displayed on the screen. The result is smoother animations on the phone, both during regular use and in games, compared to screens that have a 60 Hz refresh rate which remains the standard rate in the market when it comes to displays. Originally touted to be a "gimmick" in , with the launch of the Razer Phone , the feature gained more and more momentum in due time, even with a corresponding decrease in battery life.

In order to make the most of this feature, manufacturers began to adopt screens with variable refresh rates, which can be adjusted according to the content displayed - which is 24 fps in most movies, 30 or 60 fps in home video recordings, and so forth.

The same unit of measurement is used for the sampling rate. Although similar, the value here represents the number of times per second the screen is able to register touches. The higher the sample rate, the faster the smartphone registers such touches, which results in a faster response time. To further muddy the alphabet soup that we've come across, you will also run into other less common terms that are often highlighted in promotional materials for smartphones.

The result? Lower power consumption. Among televisions, the long-standing featured technology has always been miniLED - which consists of increasing the number of lighting zones in the backlight while still using an LCD panel. A microLED display has one light-emitting diode for each subpixel of the screen - usually a set of red, green, and blue diodes for each dot.

Chances are it will use a kind of inorganic material such as gallium nitride GaN. By adopting a self-emitting light technology, microLED displays do not require the use of a backlight, with each pixel being "turned off" individually. The result is impressive: your eyes see the same level of contrast as OLED displays, without suffering from the risk of image retention or burn-in of organic diodes.

Another advantage of microLED technology is the potential to display images with higher brightness levels while benefitting from lower power consumption, combining the strengths of both OLED and LCD panels. On the other hand, the use of multiple diodes for each pixel poses a challenge in terms of component miniaturization. For example, a Full HD resolution has just over two million pixels 1, x 1, dots , which requires 6 million microscopic LEDs using a traditional RGB red, green, and blue structure.

This is one of the reasons that explain the adoption of such technology to date remains rather limited in scope. You will see them mainly in large screens of 75 to inches only, which enable 4K resolution 3, x 2, resolution, which is close to 8. This is a huge number of pixels to look at! Each technology has its own advantages and disadvantages but in recent years, OLED screens have gained prominence, especially with the adoption of the component in high-end flagship smartphones.

It gained an even greater degree of popularity after the launch of the iPhone X, which cemented the position of OLED panels in the premium segment. Another result of this is the more realistic reproduction of black, as well as low power consumption when the screen shows off dark images - which has also helped to popularize dark modes on smartphones. In addition, the organic diodes that give OLED screens their name can lose their ability to change their properties over time, and this happens when the same image is displayed for a long period of time.

This problem is known as "burn-in", tends to manifest itself when higher brightness settings are applied for long periods of time. While that is a very real possibility, it is not something that affects most users, who often confuse burn-in with a similar problem - image retention, which is temporary and usually resolves itself after a few minutes.

In the case of LCD displays, the main advantage lies in the low manufacturing cost, with dozens of players in the market offering competitive pricing and a high production volume. Some brands have taken advantage of this feature to prioritize certain features - such as a higher refresh rate - instead of adopting an OLED panel, such as the Xiaomi Mi 10T. It is also worth remembering that, as with almost all types of components, there are AMOLED and LCD screens with different levels of quality and features, which can be combined in various ways to achieve a certain price point.

This is a lengthy discussion, which has even been the subject of a heated debate between my colleagues, Ben and Rahul. What about you? Do you have a preference for a specific display type? Did we miss any acronyms related to displays? Leave your comment below. This article was updated in March , but previously published comments have been preserved. Hey Ben! Great article! Do you have an email? I'd like to pick your brain about certain screens for a health issue.

I need help in identifying why certain screens give me intense eye pain when I look at them and others do not.